
Media
Jonathan MacArthur was recently
featured in Urban Voice.
>>
Click Here to Read the Full Article

Jonathan
MacArthur Interviewed by Steve Sanson of AllTalkRadio
Jonathan was interviewed
by Steve Sanson on AllTalkRadio for Veterans in Politics
on 8/23/2008. The interview was scheduled to be a debate
between Jonathan MacArthur and Chris Lee. However,
Mr. Lee did not attend.
>>
Click Here to Listen to the Show
Jonathan
MacArthur Featured in E RealEstateExec
Jonathan speaks with
E RealEstateExec on how crime affects property values
and how the judiciary can help combat that affect. He
also recounts a run-in with the law from his teenage years
and explains how it led him to a career defending those
who need it most.
>>
Click Here to Read the Full Article
Jonathan MacArthur
Endorsed by Veterans in Politics
On 2/33/08, the four
candidates for North Las Vegas Justice of the Peace, Department
3, appeared before the Veterans in Politics to present
their individual cases for endorsement by the organization.
The endorsement was awarded to Jonathan MacArthur.
Click Here to See the Video
(In the top navigation, click
on the radio tower "shows," then page through
"past shows" to find the NLV Department 3 judicial
race.)
Connection to D.A.’s
Office a Possible Factor in MGM Kids Case
No one can forget the
video of a group of young men assaulting an MGM landscaper
in the hotel parking lot in April of 2006. One of the
young men, Daryle Williams, fled rather than take part
in the attack, but faced the same charges because he hit
a security guard while trying to leave. Additionally,
the attorneys representing the kids saw a disparity between
their clients’ charges and the charges in a similar
case, and they draw conclusions as to why based on the
district attorney’s connection with the MGM.
>>
Click Here to Read the Full Article
Access to Evidence
Sparks Controversy
As part of the discovery
process, it is mandated that a defense attorney have access
to evidence against his client. But when that evidence
is child pornography, one prosecutor threatens to have
Jonathan MacArthur arrested for possessing it. The result
is a heated battle with MacArthur standing on the Fourteenth
Amendment for his court-appointed client and a judge giving
in to pressure from prosecutors.
>>
Click Here to Read the Full Article
Las Vegas Family Arrested Over
Teen’s Alleged Illegal Skateboarding
In a bizarre
series of events, Las Vegas teen Chris Hamilton is arrested
for allegedly skateboarding in the street outside his
home. When the parents question the arresting officer
as to why their son is in handcuffs, the mother and stepfather
of the teen are also arrested—the mother after being
pepper-sprayed in the face. All charges against the family
were eventually dismissed. And while Jonathan MacArthur,
the family’s attorney, believes that the court system
worked the way it should have, he says the incident still
raises questions of police conduct.
>>
Click Here to Read the Full Article
The Politics of Justice:
The Story Behind Jonathan MacArthur’s Bid for Judge
in North Las Vegas
by: Tiffany Pace
At
1:30 on a Saturday afternoon in mid-June a motley group
of volunteers remains gathered in the corner of Starbucks
at MLK and Cheyenne trying to hydrate themselves. It’s
106 degrees outside, and they’ve been going door-to-door
in their black campaign t-shirts handing out literature
supporting Jonathan MacArthur. Joseph is Jonathan’s
teenage brother—21 years his junior—and he
is running on three hours of sleep, as teenage boys on
summer break are apt to do. Jeff Black, another volunteer,
is Jonathan’s longtime colleague and friend. He
tells the story of coming upon a group of kids with water
balloons and encouraging the kids to pummel him with them,
which they did gleefully. Jonathan and his volunteers
are sticky and baked and tired, but they are all in surprisingly
good spirits. They have been at it for nine weeks now,
and they will do it again next Saturday morning. And the
next. And every Saturday until the primary election in
August.
This has been the grassroots
nature of Jonathan MacArthur’s campaign for justice
of the peace. Despite having an uncanny ability to raise
funds for the campaign, he relies on the belief, passion,
and support of the people who know him well to help him
reach the thousands of people in North Las Vegas who will
need to know what he stands for.
In
2005, Jonathan was encouraged to run for office in North
Las Vegas by Judge Lee Gates, a mentor of his and for
whom he was once a law clerk. At the time, Jonathan was
unconvinced, as he was enjoying his career as an attorney.
But Judge Gates revisited the subject several times over
the next few years, and he continued to open Jonathan’s
eyes to the possibility of being able to make a bigger
difference to the community as a judge than he could as
an attorney. Additionally, Jonathan saw a trend during
his years as a criminal defense attorney that had become
increasingly disturbing—one that he wanted to change.
“I
got tired of judges being a rubber stamp for the district
attorney. The D.A. gets to wear the white hat because
they’re wearing the badge and going after the criminal.
And whenever there’s gray area, the media is paying
attention and the voters are interested in the outcome,
it’s just so easy to become a rubber stamp for the
legitimacy of the state. And that may have flown, at least
briefly, in a post-911 world, but our individual liberties
have just taken too much of a hit—locally dealing
with the homeless and eminent domain, or nationally dealing
with the detainees at Guantanamo Bay. We should be embarrassed,
and it’s only now that the Supreme Court is starting
to clean up the mess. The lower courts have been asleep
at the switch, and it’s particularly bad here in
Nevada because we have elected judges, so nobody wants
to go against the grain. But I’m a fire-starter.”
The fact that judges
in Nevada are elected rather than appointed presents a
unique set of issues when it comes to how they rule, and
Jonathan has seen members of the judiciary bend to popular
opinion in order to preserve themselves and their longevity.
“Judges are human
beings, and as any human being would, they’re going
to respond to disincentives toward certain behavior. Eventually
they may give in—maybe a little, maybe a lot. It’s
one hell of a disincentive—especially for judges
here in Nevada—to make an unpopular ruling, even
if it’s what they feel they should do and what the
Constitution requires. It’s a lot to ask of them
because they might end up having to give up their jobs.”
Jonathan talks about
the outcome of this type of behavior and how it trickles
down to affect the most vulnerable of the population.
And that’s when his voice gets a little quieter,
his eyes start to shine with tears, and you can feel the
conviction behind his words.
“It’s the
opposite of democracy. When you can’t protect the
weakest in your society, then what good is your liberty?
I really, really believe in this. My passion is the idea
of liberty, the idea of equality, the idea that the law
can be administered over a large group of people in such
a way that even the people who are harmed by it can leave
feeling that they have been listened to.”
His own take on the
prospect of a career as a judge is not based in self-preservation,
but on whether he is effective and is serving the community
the way he intends.
“Typically,
politicians in the modern era are on a career path. The
founding fathers were farmers, scientists, doctors, writers
and philosophers who donated their time to a pursuit to
guarantee democracy. It may have carried a lot of prestige,
maybe even power, but it didn’t pay very well and
you were expected to go back to your life as John Q. Citizen
when you were done. That’s no longer the case. Politicians
now go from one office to a higher office to a higher
office. I can’t tell you how many people have asked
me, ‘So how long is it going to take you to go to
District Court? And then will you try to get on the Supreme
Court?’ The point is, I don’t think of becoming
a judge as a promotion, or merely the next step in my
career path. As long as I’m a benefit to the process,
I should be there. If it’s something that I don’t
do very well, then I should get out of the way and let
somebody who’s more qualified take over. There’s
nothing in the Constitution that talks about having a
right to a lifetime career as a politician.”
Jonathan’s campaign
slogan, “Equality: Every Case, Every Day, Everyone”
is his proud, very personal contribution to the campaign.
He feels it captures the essence of what he stands for
and is a goal toward which he strived during his stint
as judge pro tem in 2007.
“Everyone is
equal before my bench, whether you’re old or young,
male or female, white or black, rich or poor, everyone
has the same exact standing. That can be done in every
case, every day, for every single person. It’s almost
a trite concept, but it’s beautiful in its simplicity,
and it hasn’t been exercised as faithfully as it
should be.”
After spending several
hours in the sun and then chatting for an hour, Jonathan
looks as though he’s got another several hours of
chat left in him. And the still-gathered volunteers appear
ready to listen—with the exception of Joseph, who
appears ready for a nap. It’s this devotion to Jonathan
and his campaign that makes his chance for election not
only possible, but probable. Even though other candidates
opposing him in the August primary may have the benefit
of substantial finances—which can make a big difference
in a local campaign such as this—Jonathan has the
invaluable ability to get people involved and motivated.
And as he reminds anyone who doubts the possibility of
overcoming this kind of hurdle: “Money doesn’t
vote; people do.”

EQUALITY
Every Case
Every Day
Everyone
|
|